Patronal politics: Eurasian regime dynamics in comparative perspective
In: Problems of international politics
134 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Problems of international politics
In: Cambridge studies in comparative politics
"Despite implicating ethnicity in everything from civil war to economic failure, researchers seldom consult psychological research when addressing the most basic question: What is ethnicity? The result is a radical scholarly divide generating contradictory recommendations for solving ethnic conflict. Research into how the human brain actually works demands a revision of existing schools of thought. Hale argues ethnic identity is a cognitive uncertainty-reduction device with special capacity to exacerbate, but not cause, collective action problems. This produces a new general theory of ethnic conflict that can improve both understanding and practice. A deep study of separatism in the USSR and CIS demonstrates the theory's potential, mobilizing evidence from elite interviews, three local languages, and mass surveys. The outcome significantly reinterprets nationalism's role in CIS relations and the USSR's breakup, which turns out to have been a far more contingent event than commonly recognized"--Back cover
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 55, Heft 2, S. 251-256
ABSTRACTThe COVID-19 pandemic has forced governments worldwide—many that previously prioritized austerity—to approve large relief packages. Political economy tells us that politicians will try to profit from this electorally, but much remains unknown about precisely how pandemic relief might influence voting intentions. Then-President Donald Trump foregrounded this question early in the pandemic by becoming the first US president to physically place his name on Internal Revenue Service relief checks mailed to citizens. By leveraging a nationally representative survey whose timing achieved quasi-experimental variation in the receipt of payments both with and without Trump's name physically on them, this study asks: Can a president successfully win support through physical personalization of the payments? Yes, the study finds. Receiving a physically personalized check in the mail is associated with a much greater self-reported likelihood of voting for the president, with gains mainly from partisan outgroups. No clear effect is found for unpersonalized electronic transfers. These findings withstand multiple robustness checks.
In: Russian analytical digest: (RAD), Heft 277, S. 4-6
ISSN: 1863-0421
In: American political science review, Band 116, Heft 2, S. 580-594
ISSN: 1537-5943
When international conflict causes an authoritarian leader's popularity to soar, extant theories lead us to treat such "rallying" as sincere preference change, the product of surging patriotism or cowed media. This study advances a theory of less-than-fully sincere rallying more appropriate for nondemocratic settings, characterizing it as at least partly reflecting cascading dissembling driven by social desirability concerns. The identification strategy combines a rare nationally representative rally-spanning panel survey with a list experiment and econometric analysis. This establishes that three quarters of those who rallied to Putin after Russia annexed Crimea were engaging in at least some form of dissembling and that this rallying developed as a rapid cascade, with social media joining television in fueling perceptions this was socially desirable.
In: Post-Soviet affairs, Band 35, Heft 5-6, S. 406-421
ISSN: 1938-2855
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 63, Heft 10, S. 2402-2415
ISSN: 1552-8766
Brancati and Lucardi's findings on the absence of "democracy protest" diffusion across borders raise important questions for the future of protest studies. I argue that this subfield would benefit from a stronger engagement with theory (in general) and from a "patronal politics" perspective (in particular) when it comes to researching protest in non-democratic regimes. This means curtailing a widespread practice of linking the study of protest with the study of democratization, questioning the dominant "contentious politics" framework as commonly conceptualized, and instead focusing more on the central role of patronal network coordination dynamics (especially elite splits) in driving both protest and the potential for regime change. This perspective emphasizes the role of domestically generated succession expectations and public opinion in generating the most meaningful elite splits, and reveals how protests can be important instruments in the resulting power struggles among rival networks. It accounts not only for why democracy protests do not diffuse from neighbor state to neighbor state as per Brancati and Lucardi, but also for the timing and distribution of protests related to the 1989 downfall of communist systems in Europe, the post-Soviet Color Revolutions of 2003-05, the collapse of regimes in the 2011 Arab Spring, and the apparent failure of many other protest attempts to force far-reaching regime change.
In: Post-soviet affairs, Band 35, Heft 5/6, S. 406-421
ISSN: 1060-586X
World Affairs Online
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 77, Heft 3, S. 859-860
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Post-Soviet affairs, Band 34, Heft 5, S. 267-281
ISSN: 1938-2855
In: Comparative politics, Band 50, Heft 3, S. 369-391
ISSN: 2151-6227
In: Post-soviet affairs, Band 34, Heft 5, S. 267-281
ISSN: 1060-586X
World Affairs Online
In: Comparative politics, Band 50, Heft 3, S. 369-380
ISSN: 0010-4159
World Affairs Online
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 582-583
ISSN: 1541-0986